<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>6. Alia on The Duane Berquist Lectures</title><link>https://berquistcourse.com/course/theology/14-alia/</link><description>Recent content in 6. Alia on The Duane Berquist Lectures</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://berquistcourse.com/course/theology/14-alia/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>1. Matthew 28 (1): The Women at the Tomb, the Angel's Message, and the Bribed Guards</title><link>https://berquistcourse.com/course/theology/14-alia/001-matthew-28-1-the-women-at-the-tomb-the-angels-message-and/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://berquistcourse.com/course/theology/14-alia/001-matthew-28-1-the-women-at-the-tomb-the-angels-message-and/</guid><description>Berquist follows Aquinas&amp;rsquo;s reading of Matthew 28 under the pattern of &amp;ldquo;first hearing, then seeing,&amp;rdquo; moving from the women&amp;rsquo;s approach to the tomb through the earthquake, the angel&amp;rsquo;s announcement, and Christ&amp;rsquo;s own meeting with them. He draws out Thomas&amp;rsquo;s layered sense of the text: women restoring what women lost at the Fall, night giving way to day as a figure of sin turning to grace, and Galilee read as a kind of transmigration. He cross-references the other Gospels and 1 Corinthians 15 to line up the resurrection appearances, then closes with Thomas&amp;rsquo;s and the Fathers&amp;rsquo; answer to the guards&amp;rsquo; bribed, false report.</description></item><item><title>2. Matthew 28 (2): The Galilee Appearance, 'All Power Is Given to Me', and Why God the Father Cannot Envy the Son</title><link>https://berquistcourse.com/course/theology/14-alia/002-matthew-28-2-the-galilee-appearance-all-power-is-given-to/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://berquistcourse.com/course/theology/14-alia/002-matthew-28-2-the-galilee-appearance-all-power-is-given-to/</guid><description>Reading Matthew&amp;rsquo;s account of the risen Christ meeting the eleven on the mountain in Galilee, Berquist asks what the disciples&amp;rsquo; worship mixed with doubt means, and unpacks the threefold structure of Christ&amp;rsquo;s words, &amp;ldquo;all power in heaven and earth has been given to me.&amp;rdquo; He cross-references Mark and John to reconcile the order of the resurrection appearances. The class then turns philosophical: using Aristotle&amp;rsquo;s Nicomachean Ethics, Shakespeare&amp;rsquo;s Sonnet 37, and Aquinas&amp;rsquo;s Summa Contra Gentiles, Berquist argues that divine simplicity rules out envy between Father and Son, and closes by tying this to natural friendship and the commandment to honor father and mother.</description></item><item><title>3. Appropriation to the Persons of the Trinity and the Visions of St. Gertrude</title><link>https://berquistcourse.com/course/theology/14-alia/003-appropriation-to-the-persons-of-the-trinity-and-the-visions/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://berquistcourse.com/course/theology/14-alia/003-appropriation-to-the-persons-of-the-trinity-and-the-visions/</guid><description>Berquist asks what it means to appropriate a divine attribute to one Person of the Trinity when all three share every perfection equally. Drawing on Aquinas&amp;rsquo;s Commentary on the Sentences, he distinguishes appropriation from antonomasia, the naming of a person by a title proper to another. He then turns to the Life and Revelations of Saint Gertrude the Great, reading her visions of the Trinity and of the Blessed Virgin as the &amp;ldquo;White Lily of the Trinity,&amp;rdquo; along with words spoken to her by Christ, to show power, wisdom, and goodness recurring throughout. He closes by linking her prayers of confession and thanksgiving to Aquinas&amp;rsquo;s scriptural metaphors and to his own devotion to Gertrude.</description></item><item><title>4. Augustine on Order in God, Aristotle's Senses of Before and After, and the Rule of Two or Three</title><link>https://berquistcourse.com/course/theology/14-alia/004-augustine-on-order-in-god-aristotles-senses-of-before-and/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://berquistcourse.com/course/theology/14-alia/004-augustine-on-order-in-god-aristotles-senses-of-before-and/</guid><description>Berquist opens with a puzzle: Augustine denies any before-and-after in the Trinity, yet Aquinas defines order itself as before-and-after. He shows how Aquinas resolves this by treating Augustine&amp;rsquo;s usage as an analogous, equivocal transfer of the term—keeping the formal sense of &amp;ldquo;this from that&amp;rdquo; while stripping away the generic, temporal sense. From there he works through Aristotle&amp;rsquo;s distinct senses of &amp;ldquo;before&amp;rdquo;—in time, in being, in knowledge, in goodness, and in causality—and how Aquinas deploys them in arguing for God&amp;rsquo;s existence and divine causality. He closes by noting the mind&amp;rsquo;s habit of dividing things into twos and threes, drawing examples from the categories, Euclid, the Our Father, the four causes, and the Summa&amp;rsquo;s own tripartite structure.</description></item></channel></rss>